FSD & Autopilot ADAS Lawsuits are Piling on Tesla
Search
Close this search box.
ADVERTISEMENT
BUSINESS

FSD Lawsuits Piling on Tesla

A Tesla car on Autopilot rear-ended a Culver City firetruck on the 405 Freeway on Jan. 22, 2018. The firetruck was stopped with its lights flashing as firefighters attended to a previous crash there.(Culver City Firefighters Local 1927)

Fresh lawsuits claim Tesla “deceptively and misleadingly” marketing the Autopilot and “Full Self-Driving” features.

Last week, attorneys for Burlingame-based Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP filed a class-action lawsuit against Tesla in the US District Court in San Francisco on behalf of a Tesla owner named Briggs Matsko, of Rancho Murieta, CA, who paid $5,000 to activate the “Enhanced Autopilot” option on his 2018 Tesla Model X — an option whose cost has crept up to $15,000 in recent weeks. Matsko is seeking class-action status for the lawsuit, which would effectively “rope in” everyone who has paid Tesla for the option, believing that it would enable their cars to, you know, fully drive themselves.

Matsko’s lawsuit is distinct from another class-action lawsuit the company is facing for, what that suit calls, “phantom braking incidents,” which have (allegedly) plagued the Autopilot and cruise control features on Tesla cars for years.

For their part, some of the more reliable Tesla fans have suggested that Matsko’s lawsuits aren’t likely to generate a cash settlement. The tweet, below, from Whole Mars Catalog effectively sums up what seems to be a widely-held opinion.

In fairness, this America — and every American has the God-given right to sue every other American if they believe they’ve been wronged, but the fact that there is a lawsuit doesn’t mean that anyone has, in fact, been wronged. This particular lawsuit, however, has what (to us) seems like some pretty strong evidence supporting it, in the form of Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s own tweets about the pricey option.

In addition to the names “Autopilot,” and “Full Self Driving,” Musk’s public statements seem to have specifically promised capabilities that the systems simply haven’t been able to deliver upon. Consider that Elon told the Verge, “Ultimately you’ll be able to summon your car anywhere … your car can get to you … I think that within two years, you’ll be able to summon your car from across the country,” back in 2016.

As of 2022, self-driving Tesla cars still seem to have trouble navigating large, stationary aircraft, moving children, and parked emergency vehicles — but don’t take our word for any of that. Watch the videos, below, then let us know what you think of Matsko’s lawsuit in the comments section at the bottom of the page.

 

“Best of” Tesla FSD Compilation

SOURCES | IMAGES: THE VERGE, BENZINGA, LA TIMES.

AUTHOR: 

JO BORRAS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share ARTICLE

Ford Mustang Mach-E and Tesla Model Y Best Electric SUV Review - Electrify Reviewed main YouTube

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs. Tesla Model Y: A Deep Dive into the Best Electric SUV

Electrify rEViewed - Rawrr Mantis X vs E Ride Pro SS electric dirt bike review

Rawrr Mantis X vs. E Ride Pro SS: Choosing the Perfect Electric Dirt Bike

Trending

Simon Cellard 2022 Tesla Model 3 Performance Electrify Showoff Phoenix Best Wrap Graphics

Simon Cellard’s Award-Winning Tesla Model 3 Performance: A Customization Journey to Social Media Stardom

2024 bZ4X Limited AWD Electric SUV in Super Sonic Red

Why Leasing the 2024 Toyota bZ4X Might Be the Best Decision You'll Make This Year

Image showcasing Toyota Prius Prime EV at Electrify Expo

Why the 2024 Toyota Prius Prime Lease Is Perfect for Flexible Family Driving

ADVERTISEMENT
velowave summer fun sale
Goodyear Tire Rebate @PriorityTire | Up to $100 BACK on sets of 4 select tires
Anker Prime
Back to School Sale @PriorityTire | $15 OFF on orders of $150+ (Code: BACK24)